• R. Ancona, Time and the Erotic in Horace’s Odes: Duke University Press (1994) / bmcr  / web link
  • R. Ancona, “Horace Odes 1.25: Temporality, Gender, and Desire,” Collection Latomus: Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History edited by C. Deroux 6, Brussels (1992) 245-59
  • Ronnie Ancona, “The Subterfuge of Reason: Horace, Odes 1.23 and the Construction of Male Desire,” Helios 16 (1989) 49-57
  • C. Esler, Horace’s Old Girls: Evolution of a Topos edited by T. Falkner and J. de Luce, Albany (1989) 172-79
  • Trevor Fear, “The Poet as Pimp: Elegiac Seduction in the Time of Augustus,” Arethusa 33 no. 2 (2000) 217-40
  • E. A. Fredricksmeyer, “Horace’s Chloe (Odes 1.23): Inamorata or Victim?,” Classical Journal 89 (1994) 251-59
  • Freudenburg, Kirk, “Canidia at the Feast of Nasidienus (Hor. S. 2.8.95),” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 125 (1995) 207-219 / full text
  • E. W. Leach, “Horace Carmen 1.8: Achilles, The Campus Martius, and the Articulation of Gender Roles in Augustan Rome,” Classical Philology 89 (1994) 334-343 / full text
  • Lieberg, Godo, “La Laus mulieris nella poesia augustea,” Maia 49.3 (1997) 349-365
  • Lyne, R.O.A.M, The Latin Love Poets from Catullus to Horace, Oxford (1980)
  • G. Mader, “Heroism and Hallucination: Cleopatra in Horace C. 1.37 and Propertius 3.11,” GrazBeitr 16 (1989) 183-201
  • Oswyn Murray, “Symposium and Genre in the Poetry of Horace,” Journal of Roman Studies 75 (1985) 39-50 / full text
  • R. M. Nielsen and R. H. Solomon, “Rescuing Horace, Pyrrha and Aphra Behn: A Directive,” Ramus 22 (1993) 60-77
  • Oliensis, Ellen, “The Erotics of amicitia: Readings in Tibullus, Propertius, and Horace,” in Roman Sexualities edited by Hallett, Judith P. and Skinner, Marilyn B., Princeton: Princeton University Press (1997) 151-171 / bmcr
  • E. H. Sutherland, “Vision and Desire in Horace, C. 2.5,” Helios 24.1 (1997) 23-43
  • Elizabeth H. Sutherland, “How (Not) to Look at a Woman: Bodily Encounters and the Failure of the Gaze in Horace’s C. 1.19,” AJPh 124 no. 1 (2003) 57-80