• James I. Porter (ed.), Constructions of the Classical Body: University of Michigan Press (1999) [Introduction; Smashing Bodies: The Corinthian Tydeus and Ismene Amphora (Louvre E640); Reflections on Erotic Desire in Archaic and Classical Greece; Dirt and Desire: The Phenomenology of Female Pollution in Antiquity; Pindar and the Prostitutes, or Reading Ancient “Pornography”; From a Grin to a Death: The Body in the Greek Discovery of Politics; Sexual Bodybuilding: Aeschines against Timarchus; Odor and Power in the Roman Empire; Cicero’s Head; The Roman Blush: The Delicate Matter of Self-Control; Anti-Pygmalion: The Praeceptor in Ars Amatoria, Book 3; The Suffering Body: Philosophy and Pain in Seneca’s Letters; Chronic Pain and the Creation of Narrative; Truth Contests and Talking Corpses; Sweet Honey in the Rock: Pleasure, Embodiment, and Metaphor in Late-Antique Platonism; Ovid’s Body; Herculean Muscle!: The Classicizing Rhetoric of Bodybuilding] / bmcr
  • P. Ahlert, “Mädchen und Frauen in Pindars Dichtung,” Philologus Suppl. 34.1, Leipzig (1942)
  • Calame, Claude, The Poetics of Eros in Ancient Greece, Princeton: Princeton University Press (1999)
  • J. S. Carnes, “The Ends of the Earth: Father, Ephebes, and Wild Women in Nemean 4 and 5,” Arethusa 29.1 (1996) 15-56 / pdf
  • Clayman, D., “Corinna and Pindar,” in Nomodeiktes. Greek Studies in Honor of Martin Ostwald edited by Ralph M. Rosen and Joseph Farrell (1993) 633-642
  • Hubbard, Thomas K., “Pindar, Theoxenus, and the Homoerotic Eye,” Arethusa 35.2 (2002) 255-296
  • Hubbard, Thomas K., “Pindar, Theoxenus, and the Homoerotic Eye,” Arethusa 35.2 (2002) 255-296
  • Hubbard, Thomas K., “Pindar, Theoxenus, and the Homoerotic Eye,” Arethusa 35.2 (2002) 255-296
  • M. E. Irwin, “Evadne, Iamos and Violets in Pindar’s Sixth Olympian,” Hermes 124.4 (1996) 385-395
  • S. I. Johnston, “The Song of the Iynx: Magic and Rhetoric in Pythian 4,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 125 (1995) 177-206 / full text
  • L. Kurke, “Pindar and the Prostitutes, or Reading Ancient ‘Pornography’,” Arion 4.2 (1996) 49-75
  • L. Kurke, “Inventing the Hetaira: Sex, Politics, and Discursive Conflict in Archaic Greece,” Classical Antiquity 16.1 (1997) 106-150 / pdf
  • P. Kyriakou, “Images of Women in Pindar,” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 32 (1994) 31-54
  • S. Lavecchia, “Pindaro e le Melissai di Paro,” Hermes 124.4 (1996) 504-506
  • Charles Segal, Aglaia: The Poetry of Alcman, Sappho, Pindar, Bacchylides, and Corinna, Lanham, MD: Rowman (1998)
  • Andrew Stewart, “Nuggets: Mining the Texts Again,” American Journal of Archaeology 102 (1998) 271-82 [Uses Diogenes Laertius’s report of a dirty joke about Pheidias’s Athena Parthenos to establish the Athenians’ continued veneration of goddess and statue in the early Hellenistic period, contra Herington et al. Establishes that the sculptor Silanion indeed made a portrait of the poetess Corinna ca. 320 BC; refutes Page, Campbell and other literary critics who date her to the 3rd century; and suggests that the anecdotes about a rivalry between her and Pindar may have to be taken seriously. Establishes that the sculptor Silanion indeed made a portrait of the poetess Corinna ca. 320 BC; refutes Page, Campbell and other literary critics who date her to the 3rd century; and suggests that the anecdotes about a rivalry between her and Pindar may have to be taken seriously. Argues that the women’s chorus of cities in Eupolis’s “Poleis” was the precedent for the parade of “liberated” cities in the Pompe, and that Eupolis’s sexist remarks about them support the gendered reading I proposed for this urban troupe in Faces of Power: Alexander’s Image and Hellenistic Politics (Berkeley 1993) 258.] / full text